![female scientist working out the results](/%5E%5Ecdi={43513A8D-0012-473A-A5A1-570018B04076}%5Ehash=/-/media/project/qiagen/qiagen-home/content-worlds/digital-pcr/s-1120-9-pcr-dpcr-cw-beginners-page-header.jpg)
Evolution of dPCR
Today's complex research questions demand a depth of information beyond the capacity of traditional PCR technologies. Third-generation digital PCR is reducing that gap and becoming a much simpler and more practical technique to address these everyday research questions.
The concept of the digital PCR technique has been around 1992 when Sykes et al. described it as "limiting dilution PCR." This general method used end-point analysis and Poisson statistics to quantify the absolute number of nucleic acid molecules present in a sample. What followed was the revolutionary work by Vogelstein and Kinzler in 1999, who developed a method whereby the sample was diluted and distributed into individual reactions called partitions, and single products with fluorescence signals were detected and analyzed after amplification. They then coined the term "digital PCR," as we all know it today.
Over the years, these methods have been innovated and commercialized for wider adoption. One can perform digital PCR on microfluidic chips and discs, microarrays and microdroplets or droplet crystals based on oil-water emulsions, and more recently, in qPCR-like plates.
Still looking for answers to what is digital PCR? Check out our bench guide to learn more about the fundamentals, advantages, limitations and applications of digital PCR.
The power of digital PCR – Learn what it can do for you
Digital PCR enables absolute quantification of nucleic acids without the need for references or standard curves. The method, which partitions the sample into thousands of individual reactions, exhibits high tolerance to inhibitors, superior precision, increased sensitivity and high reproducibility. Due to these features, more and more researchers are applying digital PCR in their copy number variation analysis, rare mutation detection, viral load detection, gene expression analysis, next-generation sequencing library quantification and other applications.
Absolute quantification in 4 steps
Divide and conquer
While the sample is prepared like that for qPCR, sample partitioning where a sample is divided into thousands of individual reactions before amplification is unique to digital PCR. By random distribution of molecules into partitions, unlike the bulk analysis in qPCR, digital PCR minimizes the effects of competing targets and enhances the precision and sensitivity power of detection of the rare.
It allows researchers to:
- Quantify low-abundance targets or targets in complex backgrounds
- Detect and discriminate allelic variants (SNPs)
- Monitor small fold changes in target levels otherwise undetectable by qPCR
Top 3 advantages of partitioning
Poisson’s law gives meaning to partitioning
Contrary to real-time qPCR, digital PCR does not rely on every amplification cycle to determine the relative amount of target molecule; rather, it relies on Poisson statistics to determine the absolute target quantity following an end-point amplification.
As the target molecule is distributed randomly across all available partitions, Poisson distribution estimates the average number of molecules per partition (zero, one or more) and calculates the copies of the target molecule per positive partition. Poisson statistical analysis of the number of positive and negative reactions yields precise, absolute quantitation of the target sequence.
Featured webinars
Quick answers to FAQs about digital PCR
Reading List
- Vogelstein B and Kinzler KW (1999). Digital PCR. Proc Nat Acd Sci USA 96, 9236–9241.
- Baker M (2012). Digital PCR hits its stride. Nat Methods 9, 541–544.
- Pohl G and Shih IeM (2004). Principle and applications of digital PCR. Expert Mol Rev Diagn 4, 41–47.
- Sykes PJ et al. (1992). Quantitation of targets for PCR by use of limiting dilution. BioTechniques 13, 444–449.
- Morley AA (2014). Digital PCR: A brief history. Biomol Detect Quantif. 1(1):1-2.
- Quan PL et al. (2018). dPCR: A Technology Review. Sensors (Basel). 18(4):1271.